Rajawali Foundation logo

Feature  

A new, uniquely Hong Kong-based identity, is behind the protests

The erosion of democratic guarantees established under the “one country, two systems” policy has made young Hong Kongers more keenly aware of their unique identity, experts say at HKS Forum. But some also see caution by Chinese leaders and a desire to avoid a repeat of Tiananmen Square.

By:

  • Daniel Harsha

Programs

China Public Policy Program

Locations

China

As an endless stream of soldiers marching in close rank filled the broad avenues of Beijing to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China on Oct. 1, the streets of Hong Kong were convulsing with throngs of police and protestors locked in a standoff over the future of this former British colony and the durability of its semi-autonomous status within China.
At a recent JFK Jr Forum sponsored by the Kennedy School’s Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation and the Fairbank Center for Chinese Study at Harvard, Ash Center Director Tony Saich explained that “what has set off the latest round of demonstrations was the proposal for an extradition bill that seemed to me somewhat benign.” The bill, which would have eased the extradition process between Hong Kong and mainland China, was criticized for underming basic legal protections enshrined in Hong Kong’s legal system — and was ultimately withdrawn by Hong Kong’s chief executive Carrie Lam.
Lam’s capitulation on the extradition bill, however, failed to placate protestors who were incensed by this latest move by Hong Kong’s Beijing-backed administration to further chip away at the “one country, two systems” policy that has governed Hong Kong since its handover to China in 1997. “It really takes away the last firewall that protects Hong Kong from mainland China by eroding the difference between the Hong Kong’s judicial system and the mainland system,” noted University of Notre Dame political scientist Victoria Tin-bor Hui, who along with Shorenstein Center Fellow and former New York Times Beijing Bureau Chief Jane Perlez joined Saich on stage at the Forum.
What had started out last spring as a protest over a legislative proposal quickly spiralled into a larger, ongoing confrontation over Hong Kong’s identity and relationship to the mainland. “Among people who are 30 years and younger, they increasingly see themselves as Hong Kong people,” noted Hui who herself was born in Hong Kong. This generational shift towards a more uniquely Hong Kong-based identity has developed, Hui argued, as a response to what many younger Hong Kongers see as the erosion of the democratic guarantees made when the city was returned from British rule in 1997. “The proportion of people who see themselves as Hong Kong-Chinese has been going down and down. And people who see themselves as Hong Kong people, it’s been going up and up and up,” Hui said.
With the protests showing no signs of ending, Beijing has been grappling with how to respond. With China’s leadership making provocative moves, such as doubling the number of paramilitary People’s Armed Police stationed across the border in Shenzhen, the international community is on edge. ”People I spoke to in Beijing … said they’re going to be much cooler this time than they were in 1989; it’s a very different situation,” said Perlez contrasting the Communist Party’s relative caution towards the unrest in Hong Kong to the decision 30 years ago to send in the military to crack down on demonstrators in Tiananmen Square.
Perlez suspected that Beijing was employing a strategy of waiting out the protestors in the hopes that the demonstrations would eventually subside. “They seem to think that time is on their side,” she said.
To avoid the bloodshed of 30 years ago and reach a resolution to the crisis, Saich reminded the audience that “there has to be compromise on all sides. One of the things we saw in Tiananmen in 1989 was that all sides were so firmly convinced that right was on their side that you got to a point where it was impossible to enter into serious dialogue.”
Whether China’s leadership and Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement can find a way to compromise remains to be seen.

More from this Program

See All Programs

The Rajawali Foundation Institute for Asia and the East Asian Institute (EAI) at the National University of Singapore Forge Academic Partnership

Media Release

The Rajawali Foundation Institute for Asia and the East Asian Institute (EAI) at the National University of Singapore Forge Academic Partnership

The Rajawali Foundation Institute for Asia at the Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University and the East Asian Institute (EAI) at the National University of Singapore, are delighted to announce a new academic collaboration.

Rajawali Semester in Review
Collage of photos taken from various Rajawali events over the semester

Feature

Rajawali Semester in Review

This past semester, the Rajawali Foundation Institute for Asia engaged in conversations and research on topics ranging from Indonesia’s election to US-Taiwan relations with the goal of continuing to develop policy solutions to the region’s most pressing concerns.

More on this Location

Understanding the next phase of US-China relations
American flag bleeds into China flag

Q+A

Understanding the next phase of US-China relations

From the potential for revived tariffs to the implications for global collaboration, Rajawali Director Tony Saich examines the key dynamics shaping what could be a pivotal era in US-China relations.

The Determining Elements of the New Great Power Competition: Unpacking the Race for Technological Supremacy
Cover photo of the report

Occasional Paper

The Determining Elements of the New Great Power Competition: Unpacking the Race for Technological Supremacy

In his latest occasional paper, Ronen Medzini, Rajawali Fellow, explains that while the US and China are not strangers to the “great power” competition, technology supremacy has superseded ideology as what lies at the crux of these dynamics. He goes on to examine critical technologies, their key attributes, and their impacts on national security, commerce, and society while exploring strategies for achieving technological superiority.

The Seven Sons of National Defense
Cover photo of the report

Occasional Paper

The Seven Sons of National Defense

In his latest occasional paper, Dan Murphy explores whether partnering with these universities is advisable given the national security implications. Murphy argues that while caution is warranted, American universities should not shy away from all potential collaborations with the Seven Sons.